,The Kuala Lumpur High Court rules that the Pulau Batu Puteh suit filed by Mohd Hatta Sanuri is non-justiciable. – Wikipedia pic, July 1, 2022.usdt接口平台（www.trc20.vip）是使用TRC-20协议的Usdt第三方支付平台,Usdt收款平台、Usdt自动充提平台。免费提供入金通道、Usdt钱包支付接口、Usdt自动充值接口、Usdt寄售回收。菜宝Usdt钱包一键生成Usdt钱包、一键调用API接口、一键出售Usdt。
THE Kuala Lumpur High Court today granted the application by the prime minister and the government to strike out a suit filed by an individual in connection with the withdrawal of a review application over the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) decision on the Pulau Batu Puteh claim.
Judge Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, in allowing the application, ruled that the subject matter was non-justiciable and the plaintiff, Mohd Hatta Sanuri, had no locus standi to bring the legal action against the defendants (prime minister and the government).
Thus, the court also ordered the plaintiff to pay cost of RM6,000 within 30 days.
The matter was confirmed by senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan after attending the online proceedings today.
In 2018, the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government under the leadership of prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad withdrew an application to overturn ICJ’s ruling awarding legal jurisdiction of Pulau Batu Puteh to Singapore even before the hearing of the case, which was scheduled on June 11, 2018.
On May 28 last year, Hatta, 46, filed the suit on his behalf and on behalf of the more than 32 million Malaysians allegedly affected by the withdrawal of the review application, which was made without discussing and tabling it first in parliament.
In his statement of claim, Hatta sought an order for the defendants to provide a written explanation as to why they had withdrawn from the review of the ICJ’s decision on June 1, 2018, when a review application with strong evidence had been initiated and filed since February 3, 2017.
He also sought a declaration for the two defendants to pay compensation to each Malaysian based on the land value of Pulau Batu Puteh and based on the economic losses suffered by all Malaysians, including the plaintiff, equally, amounting to at least RM10 million each.
An order was also sought for both defendants to disclose in detail the total cost incurred by the second defendant (government) for the preparation of the ICJ decision review application on February 3, 2017, until the defendants abruptly withdrew the application on June 1, 2018.
At the time of filing in May, the premiership was held by Muhyiddin Yassin. However, after he stepped down, I *** ail Sabri Yaakob was subsequently appointed the ninth prime minister. – Bernama, July 1, 2022.